The Forecasting MachineRead report

Loading shared forecast

The Forecasting MachineOpen interactive report

Which party will win the 2026 US Senate election in Nebraska?

The election will be held on November 3, 2026. The main candidates are Pete Ricketts (Republican) and Dan Osborn (Independent).

Forecasted on

Forecast probabilities

  • Democratic Party: 0.1%
  • Republican Party: 64.3%
  • Other / Independent: 35.7%

Reasoning

Republican Pete Ricketts is favored, with a 64.3% chance of winning, but Independent Dan Osborn has a substantial 35.7% chance of an upset. The Democratic Party’s chance is just 0.1%: its nominee withdrew and the party backed Osborn instead.

Republican Party — 64.3%: Structural advantage, narrow polling edge

Nebraska’s partisan fundamentals still favor Ricketts: the state leans strongly Republican, Republicans have a registration advantage, and no independent has won a Nebraska Senate seat in generations [a3, a11, a16, a17]. Ricketts also has the advantages of incumbency and greater campaign resources: he raised more than Osborn overall, while outside group Fairshake mounted substantial support for his campaign [e850, e762]. Several late polls put Ricketts narrowly ahead, including Echelon’s 47%–46% result, and a Times/Siena poll also reported a Ricketts lead [e883, e843].

The polling advantage is small, not decisive. Nebraska’s 2024 Senate race showed how a close poll can still end in a Republican win, and the late surveys remain within the range where polling error could change the apparent leader. Ricketts’s case is therefore less about a commanding lead than about the state’s durable Republican lean and his ability to hold enough of that coalition.

Other / Independent — 35.7%: A genuine contest, not a routine Republican hold

Osborn has already demonstrated unusual strength for a Nebraska independent: he came within roughly six to seven points of Deb Fischer in 2024, despite lacking full Democratic backing. This time, Cindy Burbank withdrew and the state party endorsed Osborn, removing the risk of a Democratic nominee splitting the anti-Ricketts vote [a1, a5, a8, e789, e809]. Osborn has also built a well-funded campaign, taken his message across all 93 counties, and emphasized labor and rail issues [e850, e835, e787].

The late race signals have moved in his direction. One poll showed Osborn ahead by a point, RealClearPolitics called the contest a toss-up, and Cook shifted its rating from Likely Republican to Lean Republican [e811, e767, e808]. Meanwhile, national polling points to a difficult climate for Republicans: Democrats hold a substantial generic-ballot advantage, and Trump’s approval is deeply underwater [e892, e893, e791]. Those conditions can help Osborn’s working-class coalition, though voters’ tendency to see him as more like a Democrat than an independent may limit his cross-party appeal [e843]. Ricketts’s narrow polling leads and the state’s Republican lean keep an Osborn win from being the likeliest outcome.

Democratic Party — 0.1%: No realistic path on this ballot

The Democratic nominee withdrew, and party leaders consolidated behind Osborn rather than fielding a candidate of their own [e882, e884]. The Democratic outcome is therefore effectively foreclosed; the remaining uncertainty is whether Osborn can win as an independent.

Why the balance favors Ricketts

The strongest case for Ricketts is the outside view: a Republican incumbent in a strongly Republican state, with a modest late polling edge and a fundraising advantage. The strongest case for Osborn is that the usual base-rate story is not enough to explain a race that has stayed close, attracted major spending, and been downgraded by forecasters as the national environment has turned sharply against Republicans [e844, e849, e791]. Taken together, those signals justify making Ricketts the favorite while assigning Osborn a sizable chance—not treating a near-tied contest as either a foregone Republican win or a coin flip.

Update summary

A newly released Echelon poll showed Ricketts up by just one point, but its wide margin of error and earlier field dates make it more confirmation of a close race than a decisive new turn [e883]. A fresh national poll reinforced the difficult environment for Republicans, though it does not directly resolve Nebraska’s contest [e893].

Cited evidence